中國西南少數民族討論區

 忘記密碼
 立即註冊
搜尋
查看: 2638|回覆: 0

2003 / 12 / 10 考古、族群與認同(一)

管理員

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

發表於 2012-2-21 11:04:35 |顯示全部樓層
報告:未知
整理:蔡偉傑

二編:陳志旗 2012/02

Jones, Sian
1997 Conclusion. In The Archaeology of Ethnicity: ConstructingIdentities in the Past and Present. Pp.128-144. London;New York :Routledge.

作者簡介

Sian jones
1.Jewish local patriotism and Self-Identification in Graeco-Roman Period, Sian jones(Editor), Sarah Pearce(Editor).
2.Cultural Identity and Archaeology: The Construction of EuropeanCommuntities, Paul Graves-Brown(Editor), Sian jones

   (Editor), C.S.Gamble(Editor)

內容提要

1994 Univ. of Southampton.ph. D
1989 開始研究計畫
過去:考古學家大多將焦點集中在政治認同上、考古學研究的政治議題中不同觀點的族群議題當作認同觀點形  成

1.Introduction
2.
考古學上的文化認同與族群認同The archaeological identification of peoples andcultures
3.
族群性:觀念上與理論的範疇Ethnicity: the conceptual and theoreticalterrain
4.
從各學科的族群性走向脈絡分析架構Multidimensional ethnicity:towards a contextualanalytical framework
5.
族群性與物質文化(成為)考古學中解釋族群的理論基礎Ethnicity and material culture: towards atheoretical basis

    for the interpretation of ethnicity in archaeology
6.
結論:過去與現在的認同建構Conclusions: construction identities in the pastand the present

族群理論的比較

Habitus/subliminal disposition
Social agents/shape/be shaped by
The recognition of commonalites of sentiments
And Communication of cultural affinities and differences
Similarities
differences
羅馬化的再思考
方法論Roman-style material culture and ways oflife/political power /socio-cultural entities/
定年
生產與消費社會文化單元
考古學家的工作方式
Sprating:
One of the things which archaeologists should be trying to find out, namelywhat is the significance of variation in artifact design, is assumed at theoutset in adopting the typological method
考古學與政治上的認同






您需要登入後才可以回文 登入 | 立即註冊



中國西南少數民族討論區

GMT+8, 2020-9-22 13:00 , Processed in 0.029300 second(s), 19 queries .

© Powered by Discuz! X2

© 2001-2011 Comsenz Inc.

版權所有© 中央研究院| 歷史語言研究所. All Rights Reserved

回頂部